Skip to content
The recruitment process has many stages, two of which are key: suitability assessment and job interview. Although both aim to achieve the same goal – selecting the right person for the job – they differ significantly in their methods and objectives. In this article, we will examine how suitability assessment differs from a job interview and why both are important parts of the recruitment process.
Goals of Suitability Assessment and Job Interview
The main goal of a job interview is to get to know the applicant personally and assess their suitability for the position through conversation. The interview often focuses on the applicant’s previous work experience, education, and motivation. The interviewer also aims to assess the applicant’s personality and how they fit into the company’s culture.
The goals of a suitability assessment are broader and deeper. Various tests and methods are used in the assessment, such as cognitive ability tests, personality tests, and work style analyses. These aim to provide a comprehensive picture of the applicant’s abilities, personality, and potential. Suitability assessment offers objective data that complements the subjective information obtained in the interview.
Methods and Tools
In a job interview, mainly conversation and questions are used. The interviewer can use structured, semi-structured, or open interview methods. A structured interview includes predefined questions, while an open interview is more informal. The success of the interview depends greatly on the skills and experience of the interviewer.
Suitability assessment uses a variety of tools and tests. For example, a cognitive ability test like ACE (Adjustable Competence Evaluation) measures the applicant’s learning and problem-solving ability. A personality test like OPTO, based on the Big Five model, assesses the applicant’s behavioral traits. MPA (Master Person Analysis) helps identify the applicant’s working and interaction style. These tests provide objective and reliable data that supports decision-making.
Objectivity and Subjectivity
A job interview is inherently subjective. The interviewer’s personal preferences, biases, and experiences can influence the assessment. Although the interviewer strives to be objective, human factors can still affect the outcome.
Suitability assessment is a more objective method. Tests and analyses are based on scientifically developed metrics that reduce the impact of human factors. This makes suitability assessment a more reliable and fair way to evaluate applicants.
Time and Resources
A job interview is usually a time-limited event that lasts from one hour to a few hours. However, preparing and conducting the interview requires time and resources, especially if there are multiple interviewers or several rounds of interviews.
Suitability assessment is often a longer process that can include several tests and analysis phases. Conducting the tests and analyzing the results takes time, but they provide more in-depth information about the applicant. Suitability assessment may also require special expertise and tools, adding to the complexity of the process.
Applicant Experience
A job interview is often an exciting and stressful situation for the applicant. The success of the interview depends greatly on the interaction between the interviewer and the applicant. However, a well-conducted interview can be a positive experience that allows the applicant to showcase their strengths and motivation.
Suitability assessment can also be exciting, but it offers the applicant a chance to demonstrate their abilities more comprehensively. Tests and analyses can help the applicant better understand their strengths and areas for development. Additionally, an objective assessment can increase the applicant’s confidence in the fairness of the recruitment process.
Summary
Both job interviews and suitability assessments are important parts of the recruitment process, but they differ significantly. A job interview focuses on personal interaction and subjective assessment, while suitability assessment provides objective and comprehensive data on the applicant’s abilities and personality. By combining both methods, a comprehensive and reliable picture of the applicant can be achieved, helping to make the best possible selection.
